©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Gastroenterol. Nov 7, 2025; 31(41): 111184
Published online Nov 7, 2025. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v31.i41.111184
Published online Nov 7, 2025. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v31.i41.111184
Table 6 Comparison of different efficiency metrics of different models across architectural paradigms, mean ± SD
| Model | Parameters (M) | FLOPs (G) | GPU usage (GB) | Mean training time (minute) | Mean inference time (ms) | FPS | ||
| Self-collected | EDD 2020 | CPU | GPU | |||||
| CNN-based | ||||||||
| U-Net | 31.46 | 36.95 | 3.30 | 82.79 ± 0.25 | 10.35 ± 0.03 | 215.35 ± 37.50 | 3.64 ± 6.321 | 274.731 |
| ResNet + U-Net | 32.52 | 8.23 | 2.00 | 57.03 ± 0.351 | 6.69 ± 0.121 | 62.67 ± 6.32 | 5.18 ± 0.35 | 193.05 |
| ConvNeXt + UPerNet | 41.37 | 16.71 | 2.50 | 77.63 ± 0.16 | 8.84 ± 0.10 | 102.97 ± 8.35 | 5.65 ± 0.40 | 176.99 |
| M2SNet | 29.89 | 13.50 | 2.50 | 89.83 ± 1.75 | 9.15 ± 0.07 | 101.97 ± 6.52 | 14.86 ± 1.21 | 67.29 |
| Dilated SegNet | 18.111 | 20.72 | 3.20 | 98.38 ± 0.87 | 10.71 ± 0.04 | 146.60 ± 9.76 | 9.23 ± 1.24 | 108.34 |
| PraNet | 32.56 | 5.30 | 1.801 | 84.06 ± 0.22 | 8.18 ± 0.10 | 65.78 ± 7.19 | 12.16 ± 0.78 | 82.24 |
| Transformer-based | ||||||||
| SwinV2 + UPerNet | 41.91 | 17.19 | 2.70 | 89.07 ± 0.98 | 8.96 ± 0.09 | 126.12 ± 13.56 | 12.19 ± 0.65 | 82.03 |
| SegFormer | 24.73 | 4.23 | 2.00 | 71.93 ± 0.11 | 8.04 ± 0.19 | 61.48 ± 5.74 | 9.68 ± 0.75 | 103.31 |
| SETR-MLA | 90.77 | 18.60 | 3.00 | 71.40 ± 1.13 | 9.18 ± 0.17 | 109.13 ± 4.38 | 5.55 ± 0.52 | 180.18 |
| TransUNet | 105.00 | 29.33 | 4.50 | 107.16 ± 0.84 | 12.87 ± 0.21 | 204.71 ± 25.55 | 13.03 ± 0.71 | 76.75 |
| PVTV2 + EMCAD | 26.77 | 4.43 | 2.50 | 85.03 ± 1.18 | 9.08 ± 0.12 | 78.35 ± 9.39 | 12.56 ± 1.99 | 79.62 |
| FCBFormer | 33.09 | 29.98 | 8.10 | 163.76 ± 0.56 | 18.44 ± 0.13 | 305.01 ± 34.36 | 21.43 ± 3.49 | 46.66 |
| Mamba-based | ||||||||
| Swin-UMamba | 59.89 | 31.46 | 6.00 | 162.35 ± 0.57 | 20.68 ± 0.49 | NA | 13.00 ± 0.68 | 76.92 |
| Swin-UMamba-D | 27.50 | 6.10 | 5.30 | 148.57 ± 0.68 | 17.46 ± 0.13 | NA | 12.97 ± 1.53 | 77.10 |
| UMamba-Bot | 28.77 | 18.68 | 2.90 | 91.31 ± 0.15 | 11.03 ± 0.06 | NA | 6.27 ± 0.54 | 159.49 |
| UMamba-Enc | 27.56 | 19.05 | 3.10 | 97.68 ± 0.33 | 12.07 ± 0.04 | NA | 7.28 ± 0.45 | 137.36 |
| VM-UNETV2 | 22.77 | 4.071 | 3.20 | 108.95 ± 0.23 | 12.12 ± 0.21 | NA | 12.90 ± 7.27 | 77.52 |
- Citation: Chan IN, Wong PK, Yan T, Hu YY, Chan CI, Qin YY, Wong CH, Chan IW, Lam IH, Wong SH, Li Z, Gao S, Yu HH, Yao L, Zhao BL, Hu Y. Assessing deep learning models for multi-class upper endoscopic disease segmentation: A comprehensive comparative study. World J Gastroenterol 2025; 31(41): 111184
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v31/i41/111184.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v31.i41.111184