©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Gastroenterol. Nov 7, 2025; 31(41): 111184
Published online Nov 7, 2025. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v31.i41.111184
Published online Nov 7, 2025. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v31.i41.111184
Table 5 Performance metrics of different segmentation models on the self-collected dataset and the EDD2020 dataset, mean ± SD
| Model | Encoder size | Self-collected dataset | EDD2020 dataset | ||||
| Pixel accuracy (%) | IoU (%) | Dice score (%) | Pixel accuracy (%) | IoU (%) | Dice score (%) | ||
| CNN-based | |||||||
| U-Net | NA | 89.22 ± 0.16 | 82.14 ± 0.21 | 88.47 ± 0.17 | 93.41 ± 0.07 | 67.63 ± 0.48 | 79.37 ± 0.44 |
| ResNet +U-Net | ResNet501 | 92.20 ± 0.14 | 87.30 ± 0.30 | 91.95 ± 0.19 | 94.52 ± 0.31 | 73.97 ± 1.29 | 83.59 ± 1.05 |
| ConvNeXt + UPerNet | ConvNeXt-T1 | 93.05 ± 0.14 | 88.48 ± 0.09 | 92.76 ± 0.10 | 95.17 ± 0.13 | 76.90 ± 0.61 | 85.65 ± 0.48 |
| M2SNet | Res2Net50-v1b-26w-4s1 | 92.17 ± 0.17 | 86.93 ± 0.32 | 91.72 ± 0.26 | 94.80 ± 0.22 | 74.81 ± 1.01 | 84.24 ± 0.79 |
| Dilated SegNet | ResNet501 | 92.43 ± 0.35 | 87.47 ± 0.51 | 92.04 ± 0.32 | 94.46 ± 0.24 | 73.64 ± 0.88 | 83.35 ± 0.78 |
| PraNet | Res2Net50-v1b-26w-4s1 | 92.38 ± 0.29 | 86.35 ± 0.43 | 91.31 ± 0.31 | 94.48 ± 0.07 | 61.12 ± 0.41 | 74.15 ± 0.34 |
| Transformer-based | |||||||
| SwinV2 + UPerNet | SwinV2-T1 | 93.15 ± 0.11 | 88.50 ± 0.18 | 92.84 ± 0.12 | 95.18 ± 0.23 | 76.97 ± 0.89 | 85.59 ± 0.65 |
| Segformer | MiT-B21 | 93.39 ± 0.232 | 88.94 ± 0.38 | 93.14 ± 0.27 | 95.25 ± 0.31 | 77.20 ± 0.98 | 85.90 ± 0.76 |
| SETR-MLA | ViT-B-161 | 90.09 ± 0.43 | 83.37 ± 0.24 | 89.19 ± 0.37 | 94.17 ± 0.36 | 71.48 ± 1.43 | 82.14 ± 1.23 |
| TransUNet | ResNet501 and ViT-B-161 | 90.67 ± 0.35 | 84.55 ± 0.55 | 90.02 ± 0.40 | 92.74 ± 0.18 | 65.06 ± 1.33 | 77.35 ± 1.16 |
| EMCAD | PVTV2-B21 | 93.33 ± 0.19 | 88.74 ± 0.22 | 93.01 ± 0.16 | 95.22 ± 0.22 | 77.07 ± 0.91 | 85.81 ± 0.67 |
| FCBFormer | PVTV2-B21 | 93.04 ± 0.21 | 87.96 ± 0.34 | 92.48 ± 0.28 | 95.04 ± 0.15 | 76.03 ± 0.70 | 85.18 ± 0.45 |
| Mamba-based | |||||||
| Swin-UMamba | VSSM-encoder1 | 92.57 ± 0.10 | 87.78 ± 0.10 | 92.20 ± 0.06 | 93.81 ± 0.30 | 71.12 ± 1.26 | 81.23 ± 0.86 |
| Swin-UMamba-D | VSSM-D-encoder1 | 93.39 ± 0.19 | 89.06 ± 0.202 | 93.19 ± 0.142 | 95.37 ± 0.092 | 77.53 ± 0.322 | 86.15 ± 0.222 |
| UMamba-Bot | NA | 88.47 ± 0.20 | 81.43 ± 0.14 | 87.38 ± 0.22 | 92.04 ± 0.14 | 61.79 ± 0.86 | 75.03 ± 0.80 |
| UMamba-Enc | NA | 87.72 ± 0.11 | 80.74 ± 0.13 | 86.64 ± 0.16 | 92.12 ± 0.29 | 61.82 ± 0.56 | 75.24 ± 0.60 |
| VM-UNETV2 | VM-UNET-encoder1 | 93.09 ± 0.29 | 88.38 ± 0.34 | 92.76 ± 0.33 | 94.89 ± 0.14 | 74.89 ± 0.47 | 84.36 ± 0.42 |
- Citation: Chan IN, Wong PK, Yan T, Hu YY, Chan CI, Qin YY, Wong CH, Chan IW, Lam IH, Wong SH, Li Z, Gao S, Yu HH, Yao L, Zhao BL, Hu Y. Assessing deep learning models for multi-class upper endoscopic disease segmentation: A comprehensive comparative study. World J Gastroenterol 2025; 31(41): 111184
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v31/i41/111184.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v31.i41.111184