©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Gastroenterol. Nov 7, 2025; 31(41): 111174
Published online Nov 7, 2025. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v31.i41.111174
Published online Nov 7, 2025. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v31.i41.111174
Table 3 A review related to artificial intelligence prediction models for liver cancer
| Ref. | Model name | Model type | Aim | Dataset | Model checking | Major limitation |
| [88] | Hybrid model | Logistic regression | MVI | Total: 773. Training set: 334. Internal test set: 142. External test set: 141 | Internal test set: AUC = 0.86. External test set: AUC = 0.84 | Selection bias; most enrolled patients had a virus-related HCC |
| [89] | DECT | Logistic regression | MTM | Total: 262. Training set: 146. Internal test set: 35. External test set: 81 | Internal test set: AUC = 0.87. External test set: AUC = 0.89 | Different centers; overfitting |
| [90] | ABRS-P | CLAM | Biomarker of sensitivity to atezolizumab-bevacizumab | Total: 122. ABRS-P-high: 74. ABRS-P-low: 48 | Retrospective | |
| [91] | AI-based pathology models | CLAM | Predict the activation of 6 immune gene | Total: 336 | AUC: 0.78-0.91 | Needs further validation with clinical data |
| [92] | PLAN-B-DF | GBM | HCC prediction | Training set: 4188. Internal test set: 1397. External test set: 2883 | CI: 0.91 | Impose radiation exposure; generalizability limited |
| [93] | AI prediction model for liver cancer recurrence | MLP | Evaluate the survival of patients with HCC | Total: 912 | AUC: 0.862 | Pack of longitudinal data |
| [94] | UBE2S related model | MLP | Evaluate the survival of patients with HCC | Total: 370. Training set: 224. Test set: 146 | The 1-, 2-, 3-year survival AUC values were 076, 0.72, 0.68 | |
| [95] | PAGE-B | Cox regression | Risk prediction tool | Total: 2963 | CI: 0.77 | The lack of systematic screening information on HDV coinfection |
| [96] | SCHMOWDER | SCHMOWDER | Predicting patient survival after HCC recurrence and surgery | The transplant cohort: 300. The resection cohort: 169 | The transplant cohort: CI = 0.83 (RFS); CI = 0.87 (DSS). The resection cohort: CI = 0.64 (RFS); CI = 0.77 (DSS) | |
| [97] | MoRAL-AI | DNN | Recurrence | Total: 563. Training set: 349. Test set: 214 | CI: 0.75 | Single-region HBV cohort |
| [98] | R3-AFP | Logistic | Validation | Total: 508 | CI: 0.75 | Restricted to SiLVER trial |
| [99] | Reticulin-CNN | CNN | Prognosis | Total: 105 | CI > 0.7 | Small sample; missing HBV/HCV data |
| [100] | IR-lncRNA | Cox/LASSO | Recurrence | Total: 319. Training set: 161. Test set: 158 | CI: 0.732 | Needs external validation |
| [101] | CT-DCNN | DCNN | Diagnosis | Training set: 7512. Internal test set: 385. External test set: 556 | The internal test set: AUC = 0.887. The external test set: AUC = 0.883 | Central China predominance |
| [102] | TIL score | Cox | Quantify | Training set: 124. Test set 1: 82. Test set 2: 54 | Training set: CI = 0.770. Test set 1: CI = 0.769. Test set 2: CI = 0.712 | Slide alignment and selection bias |
| [103] | DSFR | Logistic regression | Predict early recurrence | Total: 208. Training set: 180. Test set: 28 | Training set: AUC = 0.782. Test set: AUC = 0.744 | Small sample |
| [104] | Aiforia | AI-based histological model | Histological outcome | Total: 101 | rs = 0.72 | |
| [105] | LDA | Discriminant analysis | MVI | Total: 140. Training set: 98. Test set: 42 | Training set: AUC = 0.995. Test set: AUC = 0.913 | Small size; 2-center variability |
| [106] | Random forest model | Random forest model | Waitlist Dropout | Total: 15444 | C-statistic: 0.74 | Retrospective; not externally validated |
| [107] | Multiple ML models | ML (DT, SVM, NN, etc.) | Survival | Total: 393 | Early-stage: Recall = 91% (6 months). Advanced: Accuracy = 92% (3 years) | Small, single center, retrospective |
| [108] | CNN | CNN | Predicting the outcome of ICIs treatment | Training set: PD = 197; PR = 271; SD = 342 | F1 score 698% | |
| YOLO | YOLO | |||||
| [109] | Cox PH model | Cox regression | Risk | Total: 790 | AUC = 0.86 | Retrospective; small sample |
| [110] | CART | Decision tree | HCC | Training set: 55 | AUC: 0.950 | Small sample; no validation |
| [111] | nVR | Radiomics | Recurrence | Training set: 130. Test set: 57 | Training set: AUC = 0.759. Test set: AUC = 0.765 | Retrospective; TACE method bias |
| [112] | 3D-ResNet50 | Deep learning | Grade | Total: 858. Training set: 524. Validation set: 131. External test set: 65. Internal temporal test set: 138 | Training set: AUC = 0.82. Validation set: AUC = 0.825. External test set: AUC = 0.78. Internal temporal test set: AUC = 0.81 | Retrospective; single-phase imaging |
| [113] | DCNN | Deep learning | Prognosis | Total: 236 | Training set: CI = 0.735 (RFS); CI = 0.712 (OS). Test set: CI = 0.718 (RFS); CI = 0.740 (OS) | Single-center; small sample |
| [114] | MAPL-5 | ML | HCC | Training set: 1182. External test set: 562 | Training set: AUC = 0.784; balanced accuracy = 0.712. External test set: AUC = 0.862; balanced accuracy = 0.771 | Needs external validation |
| [115] | LightGBM | Radiomics | Biomarker | Training set: 424. Test set: 102 | Training set: AUC = 0.866. Test set: AUC = 0.824 | Small sample; no multicenter |
| [116] | Random forest | Radiomics | Grade | Training set: 137. External test set: 28 | Training set: AUC = 0.80. External test set: AUC = 0.70 | Single-vendor MRI; limited external data |
| [117] | CRNN | Deep learning | Survival | Total: 207 | Training set: 0.777. Test set: 0.704 | Small sample; excluded non-lung metastases |
- Citation: Han JF, Jia ZY, Fan X, Zhao XY, Cheng LY, Xia YX, Ji XR, Zang WQ. Mechanisms of ferroptosis in primary hepatocellular carcinoma and progress of artificial intelligence-based predictive modeling in hepatocellular carcinoma. World J Gastroenterol 2025; 31(41): 111174
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v31/i41/111174.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v31.i41.111174