BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Retrospective Study
©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Gastroenterol. Nov 7, 2025; 31(41): 111022
Published online Nov 7, 2025. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v31.i41.111022
Table 3 Comparison of clinical outcomes between double-balloon enteroscopy and single-balloon enteroscopy group, n (%)/mean ± SD
Variable
DBE (n = 247)
SBE (n = 247)
P value
Overall technical success218 (88.3)229 (92.7)0.125
Technical success in 1st session217 (87.9)226 (91.5)0.237
Total adverse events26 (10.5)36 (14.6)0.222
Sedation related AE2 (0.8)3 (1.2)1.000
Post-procedure pancreatitis12 (4.9)21 (8.5)0.149
Mild12 (4.9)16 (6.5)0.125
Moderately severe0 (0.0)4 (1.6)
Severe0 (0.0)1 (0.4)
Pneumoperitoneum5 (2.0)1 (0.4)0.218
Perforation2 (0.8)0 (0.0)0.479
Significant bleeding4 (1.6)1 (0.4)0.369
Post-ERCP cholecystitis0 (0.0)6 (2.4)0.040
Post-ERCP cholangitis1 (0.4)9 (3.6)0.025
Length of hospital stay, days, median (interquartile range)5.0 (1.0-9.0)5.0 (3.0-7.0)0.054
Repeated ERCP within 30 days33 (13.4)26 (10.5)0.405


Write to the Help Desk