©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Gastroenterol. Oct 14, 2025; 31(38): 111363
Published online Oct 14, 2025. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v31.i38.111363
Published online Oct 14, 2025. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v31.i38.111363
Table 3 Subgroup analysis of the outcomes between clip-assisted endoscopic cyanoacrylate injection and endoscopic ultrasound-guided coil and cyanoacrylate injection management for patients with a maximum diameter of gastric fundal varices > 3 cm or 4 cm, mean ± SD/n (%)
| Variable | Maximum diameter of gastric fundal varices ≥ 3 cm | Maximum diameter of gastric fundal varices ≥ 4 cm | ||
| Clip group (n = 30) | EUS group (n = 12) | Clip group (n = 18) | EUS group (n = 7) | |
| Child-Pugh score | 7.2 (1.3) | 6.6 (1.7) | 7.1 (1.2) | 6.1 (1.3) |
| MELD score | 9.1 (2.1) | 7.9 (4.4) | 8.8 (2.4) | 7.0 (3.6) |
| Amount of cyanoacrylate, mL | 2.5 ± 1.3 | 2.2 ± 0.4 | 2.8 ± 1.6 | 2.4 ± 0.6 |
| Eradication of gastric fundal varices | 25 (83.3) | 10 (83.3) | 15 (83.3) | 6 (85.7) |
| Operating time, minute | 24.1 (10.1) | 44.9 (21.0)b | 27.4 (11.1) | 40.8 (10.7)a |
| Cyanoacrylate embolization | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) |
| Five-day rebleeding | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) |
| One-year rebleeding | 6 (20.0) | 2 (16.7) | 3 (16.7) | 1 (14.3) |
| Death | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) |
| Endoscopic therapy costs, Chinese yuan | 7147.7 ± 5425.1 | 12950.1 ± 6230.0a | 6764.0 ± 5639.5 | 12010.0 ± 6487.4a |
- Citation: Xiong YY, Li DW, Zhou TY, Ma H, Gao JG, Shen Z, Xu CF, Yu CH. Clip-assisted endoscopic cyanoacrylate injection vs endoscopic ultrasound-guided coil and cyanoacrylate injection for gastric varices: A propensity score-matched study. World J Gastroenterol 2025; 31(38): 111363
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v31/i38/111363.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v31.i38.111363