BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Retrospective Study
©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Gastroenterol. Oct 14, 2025; 31(38): 111363
Published online Oct 14, 2025. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v31.i38.111363
Table 2 Clinical outcome comparison between clip-assisted endoscopic cyanoacrylate injection and endoscopic ultrasound-guided coil and cyanoacrylate injection management of gastric varices, mean ± SD/n (%)
Variable
Clip group (n = 72)
EUS group (n = 36)
P value
Technique success72 (100)36 (100)
Clip number, median (IQR)2 (1-5)
Coil number, median (IQR)2 (1-3)
Amount of cyanoacrylate, mL2.0 ± 1.12.0 ± 0.60.913
Eradication of gastric fundal varices66 (91.7)34 (94.4)0.603
Operating time, minute24.0 ± 9.947.1 ± 21.0< 0.001
Cyanoacrylate embolization0 (0)0 (0)
Five-day rebleeding1 (1.4)0 (0)0.477
Esophageal varices0 (0)0 (0)
Gastric varices1 (1.4)0 (0)
Postinjection ulcers0 (0)0 (0)
One-year rebleeding17 (23.6)7 (19.4)0.623
Esophageal varices4 (5.6)2 (5.6)
Gastric varices9 (12.5)3 (8.3)
Postinjection ulcers4 (5.6)2 (5.6)
Death1 (1.4)1 (2.8)0.614
Endoscopic therapy costs, Chinese yuan7523.4 ± 5719.411153.7 ± 7679.10.007


Write to the Help Desk