BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Home / Archive / Volume 31, Issue 37
  • This Article
Peer-Review Report of This Article
CrossCheck and Google Search of This Article
Academic Rules and Norms of This Article
Citation of this article
Corresponding Author of This Article
Research Domain of This Article
Article-Type of This Article
Open-Access Policy of This Article
Times Cited Counts in Google of This Article
Journal Information of This Article
Publication Name
World Journal of Gastroenterology
ISSN
1007-9327
Publisher of This Article
Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA

Retrospective Study
©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Gastroenterol. Oct 7, 2025; 31(37): 111914
Published online Oct 7, 2025. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v31.i37.111914
Table 4 Relationship between alpha-fetoprotein levels and clinical classification of liver failure, n (%)
Type
Cases (n)
Low AFP group
Medium AFP group
High AFP group
P value1
ALF245 (20.8)15 (62.5)4 (16.7)0.004
SALF385 (13.2)15 (39.5)18 (47.4)0.008
ACLF8945 (50.6)30 (33.7)14 (15. 7)< 0.001
CLF4328 (65.1)10 (23.3)5 (11.6)< 0.001
1The χ2 test was conducted to assess the distributional differences across various liver failure classifications within each alpha-fetoprotein group. P < 0.05 suggests that the differences in distribution among alpha-fetoprotein groups regarding disease types are statistically significant.
AFP: Alpha-fetoprotein; ALF: Acute liver failure; SALF: Subacute liver failure; ACLF: Acute-on-chronic liver failure; CLF: Chronic liver failure.
Full Size Table
Write to the Help Desk
Copyright © 1993-2026 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA. All rights reserved, including rights relating to text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies. For open-access content, the applicable copyright and licensing terms govern.