©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Gastroenterol. Sep 28, 2025; 31(36): 109846
Published online Sep 28, 2025. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v31.i36.109846
Published online Sep 28, 2025. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v31.i36.109846
Table 3 Comparison of resection margins and recurrence between groups, n (%)
| Total (n = 252) | 0-1 cm (n = 225) | 1-1.5 cm (n = 27) | P value | |
| Resection margin (R0) | 0.2210 | |||
| Negative RM | 245 (97.2) | 220 (97.8) | 25 (92.6) | |
| Positive RM | 6 (2.4) | 4 (1.8) | 2 (7.4) | |
| Uncheckable | 1 (0.4) | 1 (0.4) | 0 (0) | |
| Recurrence | 1.0000 | |||
| No recur | 251 (99.6) | 224 (99.6) | 27 (100) | |
| Intramural recurrence | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | |
| Extracolonic recurrence | 1 (0.4) | 1 (0.4) | 0 (0) | |
| Synchronous recurrence | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | |
| Lymphovascular invasion | ||||
| No | 248 (48.4) | 221 (98.2) | 27 (100) | |
| Missing | 4 (1.6) | 4 (1.8) | 0 (0) |
- Citation: Kim M, Kim Y, Kim JE, Hong SN, Chang DK, Kim YH, Kim ER. Long-term outcomes of endoscopic resection of 1-1.5 cm sized grade 1 rectal neuroendocrine tumor: A retrospective study. World J Gastroenterol 2025; 31(36): 109846
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v31/i36/109846.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v31.i36.109846