Observational Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Gastroenterol. Jul 28, 2025; 31(28): 108321
Published online Jul 28, 2025. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v31.i28.108321
Table 2 Diagnostic performances of the machine learning models based on the ATS index for the diagnosis of ≥ F2 in the training and validation sets

AUC (95%CI)
P value1
Sensitivity
Specificity
Accuracy
PPV
NPV
Kappa
Training set
    LR0.81 (0.75, 0.87)Reference0.640.880.750.860.680.51
    DT0.91 (0.87, 0.95)0.0010.810.840.830.850.800.65
    SVM0.88 (0.83, 0.93)< 0.0010.820.780.800.810.790.60
    RF1.00 (1.00, 1.00)< 0.0010.981.000.991.000.980.98
    ANN0.97 (0.95, 0.99)< 0.0010.920.930.920.940.910.84
    XGBoost1.00 (0.99, 1.00)< 0.0010.950.990.970.990.940.93
Internal validation set
    LR0.70 (0.54, 0.85)Reference0.530.770.670.630.690.30
    DT0.68 (0.51, 0.83)0.8610.630.620.620.550.700.24
    SVM0.79 (0.65, 0.92)0.0370.900.650.760.650.900.52
    RF0.91 (0.82, 0.98)0.0030.790.890.840.830.850.68
    ANN0.67 (0.51, 0.82)0.7670.840.580.690.590.830.40
    XGBoost0.82 (0.69, 0.93)0.1170.740.770.760.700.800.50