Copyright
©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Gastroenterol. Jul 21, 2025; 31(27): 106819
Published online Jul 21, 2025. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v31.i27.106819
Published online Jul 21, 2025. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v31.i27.106819
Table 2 Comparison of small-bowel capsule endoscopy reading performance of conventional reading and artificial intelligence-assisted reading, n (%)/mean ± SD
Conventional reading (n = 32) | AI-assisted reading (n = 32) | P value | |
Reading time | 57.19 ± 20.30 | 9.03 ± 4.25 | < 0.001 |
Small-bowel localization | |||
First small-bowel localization | 31 (96.9) | 28 (87.5) | 0.18 |
First colon localization | 26 (81.2) | 20 (62.5) | 0.08 |
Detection of small-bowel abnormalities | |||
Detection score | 0.73 ± 0.40 | 0.75 ± 0.42 | 0.88 |
- Citation: Kwon YS, Park TY, Kim SE, Park Y, Lee JG, Lee SP, Kim KO, Jang HJ, Yang YJ, Cho BJ. Deep learning-based localization and lesion detection in capsule endoscopy for patients with suspected small-bowel bleeding. World J Gastroenterol 2025; 31(27): 106819
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v31/i27/106819.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v31.i27.106819