©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Gastroenterol. Mar 14, 2025; 31(10): 100444
Published online Mar 14, 2025. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v31.i10.100444
Published online Mar 14, 2025. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v31.i10.100444
Table 3 Comparison of postoperative pathological features between the two groups (< 1 cm), n (%)
| Group | Total | ESD | EFTR | P value |
| Margin | 0.003 | |||
| Positive | 34 (27.6) | 34 (33.0) | 0 (0) | |
| Negative | 89 (72.4) | 69 (67.0) | 20 (100) | |
| WHO grade | 0.017 | |||
| G1 | 120 (97.6) | 102 (99.0) | 18 (90.0) | |
| G2 | 3 (2.4) | 1 (1.0) | 2 (10.0) | |
| LVI | NS | |||
| Positive | 4 (3.3) | 4 (3.9) | 0 (0.0) | |
| Negative | 119 (96.7) | 99 (96.1) | 20 (100) | |
| PNI | NS | |||
| Positive | 4 (3.3) | 4 (3.9) | 0 (0.0) | |
| Negative | 119 (96.7) | 99 (96.1) | 20 (100) |
- Citation: Zhang XL, Jiang YY, Chang YY, Sun YL, Zhou Y, Wang YH, Dou XT, Guo HM, Ling TS. Endoscopic full-thickness resection: A definitive solution for local complete resection of small rectal neuroendocrine neoplasms. World J Gastroenterol 2025; 31(10): 100444
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v31/i10/100444.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v31.i10.100444