©The Author(s) 2024.
World J Gastroenterol. May 7, 2024; 30(17): 2302-2307
Published online May 7, 2024. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v30.i17.2302
Published online May 7, 2024. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v30.i17.2302
Table 1 Comparative assessment of different techniques for diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori Infection
| Criteria | Invasive tests | Non-invasive tests |
| Technique | Endoscopy | UBT, stool antigen, serology |
| Sample | Biopsy | UB, stool, serum |
| Sampling error | ++ | Variable |
| Accuracy | The gold standard | Variable |
| Skill and experience | ++ | Easily applicable |
| Time of results | Short | Longer (variable) |
| Cost | ++ | + |
| Contraindications | May not be suitable for all patients | Suitable for most patients |
| Equipment and infrastructure | +++ | ++ |
| Availability | Available in specialized settings | Widely available in various healthcare settings |
| Patient discomfort | ++ | Minimum |
| Post-treatment monitoring | + | +++ |
- Citation: Said ZNA, El-Nasser AM. Evaluation of urea breath test as a diagnostic tool for Helicobacter pylori infection in adult dyspeptic patients. World J Gastroenterol 2024; 30(17): 2302-2307
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v30/i17/2302.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v30.i17.2302