Retrospective Cohort Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2023.
World J Gastroenterol. Jun 14, 2023; 29(22): 3497-3507
Published online Jun 14, 2023. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v29.i22.3497
Table 4 The long-term outcomes of per-oral endoscopic myotomy in pediatric group and matched control group

Pediatric group (n = 34)
Matched control group (n = 34)
P value
Follow-up time, median (range), years5.7 (2.6-10.6)6.0 (2.7-10.7)0.954
Pre-POEM, Eckardt score, mean (range)8.0 (4-11)7.9 (4-12)0.975
Post-POEM (3 mo), Eckardt score, mean (range)0.3 (0-3)0.3 (0-2)0.978
Post-POEM, Eckardt score, mean (range)1.1 (0-4)1.4 (0-3)0.088
Eckardt score1 (pre-post), mean (range)6.9 (2-10)6.4 (0-12)0.578
Pre-POEM BMI, median (range), kg/m217.7 (11.2-26.8)20.0 (16.4-28.7)< 0.001
Post-POEM BMI, median (range), kg/m220.8 (15.8-29.5)24.0 (19.5-29.4)< 0.001
BMI (Post-pre)2, median (range), kg/m23.7 (-1.7-13)3.5 (0.7-12.9)0.502
Pre-POEM, Urbach score, mean (range)12.8 (10-20)12.7 (10-20)0.842
Post-POEM, Urbach score, mean (range)24.7 (18-30)25.7 (17-33)0.221
Urbach score3 (pre-post), mean (range)11.9 (1-18)13.0 (4-23)0.254
Clinical success, n (%)33 (97.1)34 (100.0)> 0.999
Clinical reflux evaluation6 (17.6)12 (35.3)0.099
Reflux esophagitis by gastroscopy2 (5.9)2 (5.9)
Symptomatic reflux4 (11.8)10 (29.4)