Copyright
©The Author(s) 2022.
World J Gastroenterol. Dec 7, 2022; 28(45): 6397-6409
Published online Dec 7, 2022. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v28.i45.6397
Published online Dec 7, 2022. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v28.i45.6397
Figure 2 Flow diagram of the study.
ITT: Intention-to-treat; PP: Per-protocol; EMR-P: Endoscopic mucosal resection-precutting; CEMR: Conventional endoscopic mucosal resection.
- Citation: Zhang XQ, Sang JZ, Xu L, Mao XL, Li B, Zhu WL, Yang XY, Yu CH. Endoscopic mucosal resection-precutting vs conventional endoscopic mucosal resection for sessile colorectal polyps sized 10-20 mm. World J Gastroenterol 2022; 28(45): 6397-6409
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v28/i45/6397.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v28.i45.6397