Retrospective Cohort Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2022.
World J Gastroenterol. Oct 14, 2022; 28(38): 5602-5613
Published online Oct 14, 2022. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v28.i38.5602
Table 2 Characteristics of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography
Patient characteristics
Total, n = 683
Time to ERCP divided by 24 h
Time to ERCP divided by 48 h
ERCP ≤ 24 h, n = 134
ERCP > 24 h, n = 549
P value
ERCP ≤ 48 h, n = 314
ERCP > 48 h, n = 369
P value
Time to ERCP in h1 53.8 (28.4-90.7)17.7 (9.0-20.4)67.6 (43.6-98.9)-26.0 (18.8-40.1)88.5 (67.2-114.6)
Indications of ERCP, n (%)
Common bile duct stones508 (74.4)107 (79.9)401 (73)0.106256 (81.5)252 (68.3)< 0.001
Malignant obstruction70 (10.2)7 (5.2)63 (11.5)0.03219 (6.1)51 (13.8)< 0.001
Stent dysfunction61 (8.9)8 (6.0)53 (9.7)0.18017 (5.4)44 (11.9)0.003
Benign stricture31 (4.5)8 (6.0)23 (4.2)0.37515 (4.8)16 (4.3)0.783
Others13 (1.9)4 (3.0)9 (1.6)0.2967 (2.2)6 (1.6)0.565
Treatment during ERCP, n (%)
ES558 (81.7)112 (83.6)446 (81.2)0.529269 (85.7)289 (78.3)0.013
EPBD5 (0.7)05 (0.9)0.5892 (0.6)3 (0.8)1
Stone retrieval502 (73.5)108 (80.6)394 (71.8)0.038250 (79.6)252 (68.3)0.001
Clearance without stone37 (5.4)5 (3.7)32 (5.8)0.33616 (5.1)21 (5.7)0.732
Removal of old stents60 (8.8)6 (4.5)54 (9.8)0.04917 (5.4)43 (11.7)0.004
Stent insertion187 (27.4)35 (26.1)152 (27.7)0.71570 (22.3)117 (31.7)0.006
Biliary stricture dilatation7 (1.0)1 (0.7)6 (1.1)11 (0.3)6 (1.6)0.132
Others3 (0.4)03 (0.5)103 (0.8)0.254
ERCP failure, n (%)7 (1.0)07 (1.3)0.3561 (0.3)6 (1.6)0.132