Retrospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2022.
World J Gastroenterol. May 7, 2022; 28(17): 1845-1859
Published online May 7, 2022. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v28.i17.1845
Table 2 Techniques and outcomes of endoscopic papillectomy

n (%)/mean ± SD (n = 106)
EUS 37 (34.9)
ERCP
Cholangiogram70 (66.0)
Pancreatogram87 (82.1)
Submucosal lifting4 (3.8)
Type of resection
En-bloc90 (84.9)
Piecemeal16 (15.1)
Thermal ablation after resection24 (22.6)
Complete endoscopic resection105 (99.1)
Stent implantation
Bile duct25 (23.6)
Pancreatic duct78 (73.6)
Resection specimen size, mm13.6 ± 5.5
≤ 1577 (72.6)
> 1529 (27.4)
Final pathology
Chronic inflammation3 (2.8)
Adenoma
Low grade81 (76.4)
High grade18 (17.0)
Adenocarcinoma4 (3.8)
Accuracy of endoscopic biopsy
Underestimate18 (17.0)
Overestimate4 (3.8)
Resection margin
Negative84 (79.2)
Positive/Uncertain22 (20.8)
Positive19 (17.9)
Uncertain3 (2.8)
Curative resection81 (76.4)
Early recurrence11 (10.4)
Late recurrence13 (12.3)
Re-recurrence6 (5.7)
Endoscopic success99 (93.4)
Mean hospital stay, d5.7 ± 3.0
Mean adenoma-free period, mo29.6 ± 21.3