Clinical features of multiple gastrointestinal stromal tumors: A pooling analysis combined with evidence and gap map

doi:10.3748/wjg.v26.i47.7550

Advanced Search

BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge

Home / Archive / Volume 26, Issue 47

This Article

(259)

(343)

(0)

(11)

(5871)

(5)

Peer-Review Report of This Article

CrossCheck and Google Search of This Article

Academic Rules and Norms of This Article

Supplementary Materials of This Article

Citation of this article

Corresponding Author of This Article

Research Domain of This Article

Article-Type of This Article

Open-Access Policy of This Article

Times Cited Counts in Google of This Article

Journal Information of This Article

Publication Name

World Journal of Gastroenterology

ISSN

1007-9327

Publisher of This Article

Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA

- Full Article with Cover (PDF)
- Full Article (XML)

Retrospective Study

World J Gastroenterol. Dec 21, 2020; 26(47): 7550-7567
Published online Dec 21, 2020. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v26.i47.7550

Table 3 Perioperative information and follow-up results of patients with multiple gastrointestinal stromal tumors, n (%)

	PKUPH patients, n = 12¹	Literature-based patients, n = 161¹	Total patients, n = 173¹
Preoperative I.E.	n = 12	n = 29	n = 41
CT	12 (100.00)	19 (65.52)	31 (75.61)
MRI	2 (16.67)	2 (6.90)	4 (9.76)
Endoscopy	6 (50.00)	21 (72.41)	27 (65.85)
Approach	n = 12	n = 25	n = 37
Laparotomy	5 (41.67)	18 (72.00)	23 (62.16)
Laparoscopy	7 (58.33)	7 (28.00)	14 (37.84)
Excision Extension	n = 12	n = 30	n = 42
Radical resection	9 (75.00)	22 (73.33)	31 (73.81)
Palliative resection	3 (25.00)	8 (26.67)	11 (26.19)
Imatinib	n = 12	n = 37	n = 49
Apply	7 (58.33)	25 (67.57)	32 (65.31)
Not apply	5 (41.67)	12 (32.43)	17 (34.70)
Follow-up time in mo	n = 12	n = 114	n = 126
Range	3-86	3-396	3-396
Mean (SD)	33.75 (27.28)	83.01 (82.26)	78.32 (79.96)
Outcome	n = 12	n = 123	n = 135
ANED	12 (100.00)	77 (62.60)	89 (65.93)
AWD	0 (0.00)	21 (17.07)	21 (15.56)
ATSU	0 (0.00)	2 (1.63)	2 (1.48)
DOD	0 (0.00)	7 (5.69)	7 (5.19)
DUC	0 (0.00)	9 (7.32)	9 (6.67)
DOPC	0 (0.00)	2 (1.63)	2 (1.48)
DUNC	0 (0.00)	5 (4.07)	5 (3.70)
Recurrence	0/12 (0.00)	3/123 (2.44)	3/135 (2.22)
Metastasis	n = 12	n = 123	n = 135
Lymph node	0 (0.00)	5 (4.07)	5 (3.70)
Liver	0 (0.00)	8 (6.50)	8 (5.93)
Peritoneum	0 (0.00)	9 (7.32)	9 (6.67)
Lung	0 (0.00)	1 (0.76)	1 (0.74)
Abdomen	0 (0.00)	1 (0.76)	1 (0.74)
Omentum	0 (0.00)	1 (0.76)	1 (0.74)

¹n For total number of patients, other n for number of patients with relevant data. CT: Computed tomography; I.E.: Imaging examinations; MRI: Magnetic resonance imaging; PKUPH: Peking University People’s Hospital; SD: Standard deviation.

Full Size Table

Citation: Li C, Yang KL, Wang Q, Tian JH, Li Y, Gao ZD, Yang XD, Ye YJ, Jiang KW. Clinical features of multiple gastrointestinal stromal tumors: A pooling analysis combined with evidence and gap map. World J Gastroenterol 2020; 26(47): 7550-7567
URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v26/i47/7550.htm
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v26.i47.7550

Li C, Yang KL, Wang Q, Tian JH, Li Y, Gao ZD, Yang XD, Ye YJ, Jiang KW. Clinical features of multiple gastrointestinal stromal tumors: A pooling analysis combined with evidence and gap map. World J Gastroenterol 2020; 26(47): 7550-7567 [PMID: 33384554 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v26.i47.7550]

All content on this site: Copyright © 1993-2026 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, its licensors, and contributors. All rights are reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies. For all open access content, the relevant licensing terms apply.