Retrospective Cohort Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2020.
World J Gastroenterol. Nov 21, 2020; 26(43): 6853-6866
Published online Nov 21, 2020. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v26.i43.6853
Table 3 Prognostic value, univariate and multivariate analyses of potential predictor for recurrence
Variables
HR95%CIP value
Univariate
Age (≤ 49 vs > 49 yr)0.7420.303-1.8180.515
Gender (Male vs Female)0.7580.302-1.9010.555
Depth of penetration (T3 vs pT4)1.3100.383-4.4760.006
Lymph node
N01 (ref)
N12.5900.795-8.4390.114
N27.5622.189-26.1150.001
Tumor stage (TNM) (II vs III)3.6101.201-10.8490.022
Differentiation (well/moderate vs poor/mucinous)2.5611.058-6.1980.037
Tumor site
Left1 (ref)
Right0.7350.205-2.6360.637
Rectum0.8340.307-2.2630.721
CEA (normal vs high)4.7221.933-11.5350.001
CA19-9 (normal vs high)3.9611.633-9.6060.002
MSI (MSS vs MSI)0.0470.000-1327.1120.559
Lung metastasis (absent vs present)2.3250.844-6.4050.103
Liver metastasis (absent vs present)2.3510.785-7.0380.127
DCLK1 (low vs high)3.9581.496-10.4720.006
Lgr5 (low vs high)2.5211.025-6.1990.044
DCLK1/Lgr5 (others1 vs high/high)3.8081.471-9.8540.006
Multivariate
Tumor stage (TNM) (II vs III)6.8461.918-24.4450.003
Differentiation (well/moderate vs poor/mucinous)1.8640.699-4.9710.241
CEA (normal vs high)4.8351.651-14.1540.004
CA19-9 (normal vs high)4.1021.529-11.0050.005
DCLK1 (low vs high)4.6561.207-17.9560.026
Lgr5 (low vs high)0.7640.076-7.6910.819
DCLK1/Lgr5 (others1 vs high/high)3.4290.212-55.5830.386