Prospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2020.
World J Gastroenterol. Nov 7, 2020; 26(41): 6475-6487
Published online Nov 7, 2020. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v26.i41.6475
Table 1 Baseline characteristics and treatment outcome of the third-look endoscopy group

TLE group (n = 114)

TLE group (n = 114)
Age, mean ± SD (yr)75.5 ± 0.6En-bloc resection, % (n)100 (114)
SexR0 resection, % (n)100 (114)
Male, % (n)86.0 (98)Curative resection, % (n)90.4 (103)
Female, % (n)14.0 (16)Median procedure time (range)41.5 (10-180)
Location-1SLE Hemostasis, % (n)68.8 (77)
Upper, % (n)18.4 (21)Forrest classification 1b, % (n)10.7 (12)
Middle, % (n)12.3 (14)Forrest classification 2a, % (n)58.0 (65)
Lower, % (n)69.3 (79)TLE Hemostasis, % (n)35.7 (40)
Location-2Forrest classification 1b, % (n)10.7 (12)
Anterior wall, % (n)8.8 (10)Forrest classification 2a, % (n)25.0 (28)
Posterior wall, % (n)31.6 (36)The day of TLE, % (n)
Lesser curvature, % (n)40.3 (46)POD 429.8 (34)
Greater curvature, % (n)19.3 (22)POD 554.4 (62)
MorphologyPOD 614.0 (16)
Protruded, % (n)42.9 (49)Comorbidities
Flat/depressed, % (n)57.0 (65)Hypertension, % (n)85.1 (97)
Median tumor size (range)11.0 (2-70)Diabetes mellitus, % (n)21.9 (25)
Median specimen size (range)35.0 (18-95)Hyperlipidemia, % (n)54.4 (62)
Synchronous occurrence, % (n)22.9 (22/96 patients)Cardiac disease, % (n)69.3 (79)
Ulcerative findingsCerebral infarction, % (n)24.6 (28)
(+), % (n)5.3 (6)Hemodialysis, % (n)3.5 (4)
(-) , % (n)94.7 (108)Receiving antithrombotic agents
Depth of invasionContinue, % (n)100 (114)
M/SM1, % (n)98.2 (112)Discontinue, % (n)0 (0)
SM2-, % (n)1.8 (2)Antithrombotic agents
Pathological findingAspirin, % (n)43.9 (50)
Differentiated type, % (n)95.6 (109)Thienopyridine, % (n)10.5 (12)
Undifferentiated type, % (n)4.4 (5)Cilostazol, % (n)5.3 (6)
lymphovascular infiltration Warfarin, % (n)2.6 (3)
(+), % (n)4.4 (5)DOAC, % (n)20.2 (23)
(-) , % (n)95.6 (109)Multiple antithrombotic agents, % (n)17.5 (20)