Retrospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2020.
World J Gastroenterol. Nov 7, 2020; 26(41): 6431-6441
Published online Nov 7, 2020. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v26.i41.6431
Table 2 The main endoscopic procedural characteristics of all five patients in this study
Characteristics
Case 1
Case 2
Case 3
Case 4
Case 5
Successful EGFNo. Non-adherence of encapsulated WON to the gastric wall. Stent placement also failed, so a nasocystic drainage tube was inserted insteadYesYesYesYes
Fenestration sitesPosterior wall between gastric antrum and bodyUpper posterior wall of gastric bodyGreater curvature of gastric fundusPosterior wall of gastric antrumPosterior wall between gastric antrum and body
Diameter of fenestration sites (cm)-21.52.53
Total procedure time (min)17816211794123
EUS assessment time (min)8053203323
Total fenestration time (min)3575604270
Initial fenestration (by ESD approach) time (min)3552191628
Expanded fenestration time (min)-23412642
WON fluid drainage time (min)-5171320
WON exploration and necrosectomy time (min)-2720610
Intraoperative fluid collection of WON (mL)40 cloudy brown liquid 500 light gray liquid 1000 cloudy brown liquid 400 light gray liquid 1300 yellowish pus
Endoscopic procedural cost ($)3549.12136.42381.42096.71941.5