Meta-Analysis
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2020.
World J Gastroenterol. Oct 28, 2020; 26(40): 6279-6294
Published online Oct 28, 2020. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v26.i40.6279
Table 3 Summary of the results of each category for the Japan Narrow-band-imaging Expert Team classification and the Pit pattern classification corresponding to histological diagnosis in the included studies
JNETSensitivitySpecificityDORAUCPit patternSensitivitySpecificityDORAUC
10.73 [0.55, 0.85]0.99 [0.97, 1.00]245 [64, 936]0.97 [0.95, 0.98]II0.76 [0.62, 0.86]0.96 [0.88, 0.98]68 [15, 309]0.92 [0.90, 0.94]
2A0.88 [0.78, 0.94]0.72 [0.64, 0.79]19 [11, 33]0.84 [0.81, 0.87]IIIL + IV0.80 [0.67, 0.89]0.80 [0.74, 0.86]17 [8, 34]0.87 [0.83, 0.89]
2B0.56 [0.47, 0.64]0.91 [0.79, 0.96]13 [7, 24]0.72 [0.68, 0.76]IIIS + VI-L0.45 [0.23, 0.69]0.88 [0.75, 0.94]6 [1, 26]0.79 [0.75, 0.82]
30.51 [0.42, 0.61]1.00 [1.00, 1.00]801 [267, 2398]0.90 [0.87, 0.93]VN + VI-H0.73 [0.55, 0.85]0.99 [0.98, 1.00]449 [93, 2182]0.98 [0.97, 0.99]
Non-neoplastic0.73 [0.55, 0.85]0.99 [0.97, 1.00]245 [64, 936]0.97 [0.95, 0.98]Non-neoplastic0.86 [0.81, 0.90]0.94 [0.90, 0.96]88 [48, 156]0.95 [0.93, 0.97]