Non-invasive prediction model for high-risk esophageal varices in the Chinese population

doi:10.3748/wjg.v26.i21.2839

Advanced Search

BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge

Home / Archive / Volume 26, Issue 21

This Article

Academic Content and Language Evaluation of This Article

CrossCheck and Google Search of This Article

Academic Rules and Norms of This Article

Citation of this article

Corresponding Author of This Article

Research Domain of This Article

Article-Type of This Article

Open-Access Policy of This Article

Times Cited Counts in Google of This Article

Number of Hits and Downloads for This Article

Total Article Views (6224)

All Articles published online

The chart showing PDF series, WORD series, HTML series, Figures (1-3) series, Tables (1-7) series.

Item

Count

PDF

356

WORD

185

HTML

3156

Figures (1-3)

305

Tables (1-7)

187

Sum=4189

Publishing Process of This Article

The chart showing Browse series, Download series.

Item

Count

Browse

785

Download

1250

Sum=2035

Jun 7, 2020 (publication date) through Apr 24, 2024

Times Cited of This Article

Times Cited (8)

Journal Information of This Article

Publication Name

World Journal of Gastroenterology

ISSN

1007-9327

Publisher of This Article

Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA

Retrospective Study

World J Gastroenterol. Jun 7, 2020; 26(21): 2839-2851
Published online Jun 7, 2020. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v26.i21.2839

Table 3 Univariate analysis of parameters of patients with high-risk esophageal varices and low-risk esophageal varices

Parameter	Patients with HEVs, n = 56	Patients with LEVs, n = 30	P value
PVSA, mm³	227.04 ± 76.66	183.81 ± 69.10	< 0.01
PVD, mm	14.35 ± 2.64	12.67 ± 2.58	< 0.01
SVD, mm	10.08 ± 3.36	8.52 ± 2.67	0.02
CTLV, cm³	901.95 ± 219.00	935.18 ± 299.83	0.66
CTSV, cm³	917.30 ± 394.37	546.00 ± 375.35	< 0.01
Ratio of liver and spleen volume	1.18 ± 0.57	3.16 ± 5.25	< 0.01
SSV, cm³	177.03 ± 33.41	175.34 ± 29.76	0.81
SLV, cm³	1052.08 ± 151.88	1044.40 ± 135.25	0.80
Rate of change of liver volume, %	-0.14 ± 0.20	-0.10 ± 0.29	0.68
Rate of change of spleen volume, %	4.21 ± 2.11	2.06 ± 2.07	< 0.01
Change of liver volume, cm³	-150.13 ± 224.10	-109.22 ± 300.13	0.56
Change of spleen volume, cm³	740.27 ± 382.77	370.66 ± 365.27	< 0.01
Spleen diameter, cm	15.81 ± 2.67	12.67 ± 2.58	<0.01
ALT, IU/L	57.68 (15-176)	40.97 (13-88)	<0.01
AST, IU/L	36.38 (10-81)	61.26 (18-164)	<0.01
TBIL, μmol/L	27.89 (3.5-73.69)	34.12 (6-119.7)	0.59
PT in s	13.69 (9.9-24)	13.50 (9.1-18.2)	0.85
TT in s	20.44 (17.2-27.9)	20.28 (16.9-23.1)	0.01
PLT, × 10⁹/L	57.68 (15-176)	73.77 (29-159)	0.05
LSM, kPa	20.45 (9.4-36.1)	26.8 (7.6-75)	0.26

P < 0.05 is considered statistically significant. HEVs: High-risk esophageal varices; LEVs: Low-risk esophageal varices; PVSA: Portal vein surface area; PVD: Portal vein diameter; SVD: Splenic vein diameter; CTLV: Actual liver volume measured by CT; CTSV: Actual spleen volume measured by CT; SSV: Standard spleen volume calculated by equation; SLV: Standard liver volume calculated by equation; ALT: Alanine aminotransferase; AST: Aspartate aminotransferase; TBIL: Total bilirubin; PT: Prothrombin time; TT: Thrombin time; LSM: Liver stiff measurement.

Citation: Yang LB, Xu JY, Tantai XX, Li H, Xiao CL, Yang CF, Zhang H, Dong L, Zhao G. Non-invasive prediction model for high-risk esophageal varices in the Chinese population. World J Gastroenterol 2020; 26(21): 2839-2851
URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v26/i21/2839.htm
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v26.i21.2839