©The Author(s) 2020.
World J Gastroenterol. May 14, 2020; 26(18): 2232-2246
Published online May 14, 2020. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v26.i18.2232
Published online May 14, 2020. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v26.i18.2232
Table 5 Analysis of the risk factors associated with overall survival in patients who underwent total gastrectomy using the Cox proportional hazard model
| Univariate | Multivariate | |||
| HR (95%CI) | P value | HR (95%CI) | P value | |
| Age | 1.02 (1.01-1.03) | < 0.001 | 1.03 (1.02-1.04) | < 0.001 |
| Female sex | 1.03 (0.81-1.30) | 0.834 | ||
| BMI | 0.95 (0.92-0.99) | 0.009 | ||
| Tumor location | ||||
| Upper 1/3 | Ref. | |||
| Mid 1/3 | 0.76 (0.60-0.95) | 0.018 | ||
| Lower 1/3 | 0.94 (0.65-1.35) | 0.723 | ||
| Tumor size | 1.09 (1.07-1.12) | < 0.001 | ||
| Borrmann type IV | 2.21 (1.66-2.94) | < 0.001 | 1.93 (1.43-2.60) | < 0.001 |
| CLN | 1.00 (0.99-1.01) | 0.548 | 0.99 (0.98-1.00) | 0.035 |
| T stage | ||||
| T2 | Ref. | Ref. | ||
| T3 | 1.67 (1.14-2.45) | 0.008 | 1.21 (0.81-1.81) | 0.352 |
| T4 | 3.24 (2.22-4.72) | < 0.001 | 1.85 (1.22-2.79) | 0.004 |
| N stage | ||||
| N0 | Ref. | Ref. | ||
| N1 | 1.11 (0.74-1.68) | 0.617 | 1.03 (0.67-1.57) | 0.900 |
| N2 | 1.73 (1.21-2.46) | 0.003 | 1.48 (1.01-2.18) | 0.045 |
| N3 | 3.87 (2.88-5.19) | < 0.001 | 2.81 (1.98-3.98) | < 0.001 |
| Diffuse type histology | 1.23 (0.96-1.58) | 0.103 | ||
| LVi | 2.09 (1.65-2.64) | < 0.001 | 1.43 (1.10-1.86) | 0.008 |
| PNi | 1.60 (1.27-2.00) | < 0.001 | ||
| PRM (cm) | ||||
| 0-1.0 | Ref. | |||
| 1.1-3.0 | 0.80 (0.57-1.10) | 0.164 | ||
| 3.1-5.0 | 0.65 (0.45-0.93) | 0.019 | ||
| > 5.0 | 0.81 (0.58-1.12) | 0.202 | ||
- Citation: Kim A, Kim BS, Yook JH, Kim BS. Optimal proximal resection margin distance for gastrectomy in advanced gastric cancer. World J Gastroenterol 2020; 26(18): 2232-2246
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v26/i18/2232.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v26.i18.2232