Meta-Analysis
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2019.
World J Gastroenterol. Aug 21, 2019; 25(31): 4555-4566
Published online Aug 21, 2019. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i31.4555
Table 1 Study and patient characteristics of the included studies
Ref.Year of publicationCountryStudy designFounding sourcesPatient spectrumInclusion criteriaDisease activityNo. of patientsAge, yr, mean (range)or mean ± SDGender, male: female
Del Vescovo et al[19]2008ItalyProspectiveNRKnown CD/healthy controlsProven terminal ileum CD/no history of bowel disease8 active CD, 8 non-active CD, 7 healthy controls2337.5 ± 17.4115:8
Grieser et al[18]2012GermanyRetrospectiveNRKnown CDReferred to MRI for evaluation of disease activity24 active CD, 24 patients non-active CD4837 ± 1116:32
Koh et al[10]2001EnglandProspectiveNRKnown CDClinically symptoma-tic patients referred to MRI by gastroenterologists23 active CD, 7 patients non-active CD3037.6 (18-58)14:16
Quaia et al[17]2014ItalyRetrospectiveNRKnown CDClinically symptoma-tic patients referred to MRI for evaluation of disease activity47 active CD, 44 patients non-active CD9139.6 ± 17.147:44
Zappa et al[11]2011FranceRetrospectiveNRKnown CDPatients who were to undergo bowel resection for small bowel CD42 active CD, 11 patients non-active CD5335 (15-74)28:25