©The Author(s) 2019.
World J Gastroenterol. Jul 21, 2019; 25(27): 3468-3483
Published online Jul 21, 2019. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i27.3468
Published online Jul 21, 2019. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i27.3468
Table 4 Grading System for endoscopic-retrograde-cholangiopancreatography difficulty
| Grading system for ERCP |
| Grade I |
| Deep cannulation of CBD or main pancreatic duct |
| Extraction of small-to-medium (≤ 10 mm) biliary stones |
| Biliary stenting for leaks |
| Grade II |
| Treatment of extra-hepatic benign or malignant ductal strictures |
| Placement of prophylactic pancreatic stents |
| Extraction of larger biliary stones |
| Grade III |
| Pancreatic stricture dilation and stenting |
| Removal of mobile pancreatic stones ≤ 5 mm |
| Hilar tumor stenting |
| Treatment of hilar and intrahepatic biliary stricture |
| Sphincter of Oddi manometry |
| Limited pancreatic sphincterotomy |
| Removal of migrated pancreatic stents |
| Grade IV |
| Removal of impacted and larger pancreatic stones |
| Pseudocyst drainage or necrosecetomy |
| Ampullectomy |
| ERCP in patient with altered anatomy (e.g., status post Billroth II surgery) |
| Minor papilla therapy |
| Grade V |
| “Rendezvous” procedure to access and stent the biliary and pancreatic systems - requires endoscopic ultrasound training |
- Citation: Cappell MS, Friedel DM. Stricter national standards are required for credentialing of endoscopic-retrograde-cholangiopancreatography in the United States. World J Gastroenterol 2019; 25(27): 3468-3483
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v25/i27/3468.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v25.i27.3468