©The Author(s) 2019.
World J Gastroenterol. Jun 28, 2019; 25(24): 3091-3107
Published online Jun 28, 2019. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i24.3091
Published online Jun 28, 2019. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i24.3091
Table 3 Results of the systematic review
| No. (%) | |
| Study design, n (%) | |
| Retrospective cohort | 36/43 (83.7) |
| Retrospective comparative | 4/43 (9.3) |
| Prospective comparative | 2/43 (4.7) |
| Prospective cohort | 1/43 (2.3) |
| Total number of identified patients | 2669 |
| 1Type of endoscope, n (%) | |
| Side-viewing endoscope | 1432/2575 (55.6) |
| Forward-viewing endoscope | 664/2575 (25.8) |
| Balloon-assisted enteroscope | 197/2575 (7.7) |
| Anterior oblique-viewing endoscope | 169/2575 (6.6) |
| Dual-lumen endoscope | 64/2575 (2.5) |
| Colonoscope | 31/2575 (1.2) |
| Multiple bending endoscope | 14/2575 (0.5) |
| Others | 4/2575 (0.2) |
| Overall success of afferent loop intubation, n (%) | 2437/2669 (91.3) |
| Overall success of selective cannulation, n (%) | 2346/2437 (87.9) |
| Overall adverse events, n (%) | 195 (7.3) |
| Bowel perforation | 74 (2.8) |
| Post-ERCP pancreatitis | 65 (2.4) |
| Bleeding | 37 (1.4) |
| Mortality | 9 (0.3) |
| 2Others | 10 (0.4) |
- Citation: Park TY, Song TJ. Recent advances in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in Billroth II gastrectomy patients: A systematic review. World J Gastroenterol 2019; 25(24): 3091-3107
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v25/i24/3091.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v25.i24.3091