Observational Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2019.
World J Gastroenterol. Jun 28, 2019; 25(24): 3079-3090
Published online Jun 28, 2019. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i24.3079
Table 3 Logistic regression results for clinical resolution and rapid clinical resolution on global improvement score
Resolution (area under the curve; AUC = 0.72)
Rapid (vs slow) resolution (AUC = 0.63)
VariableOdds ratio (95%CI)P valueOdds ratio (95%CI)P value
Age at IE0.81 (0.73, 0.90)< 0.001a0.95 (0.85, 1.06)0.365
Pain hx (in yr)1.00 (0.92, 1.08)0.949
Eosinophilia0.84 (0.45, 1.58)0.593
ActEng T-score1.11 (0.83, 1.48)0.479
PainWill T-score0.62 (0.46, 0.82)0.001a1.06 (0.74, 1.52)0.742
RfR0.85 (0.62, 1.15)0.288
AttnPriv1.02 (0.77, 1.37)0.865
School (not in school vs full-time)1.72 (0.70, 4.45)0.183
School (modified schedule vs full-time)0.81 (0.40, 1.66)0.243
Anxiety1.08 (0.76, 1.54)0.667
Depression1.25 (0.82, 1.93)0.301
Atypicality1.02 (0.72, 1.43)0.92
Anxiety_A1.15 (0.76, 1.75)0.502
Depression_A0.98 (0.64, 1.49)0.915
Atypicality_A1.10 (0.79, 1.56)0.588
SDSCTot0.72 (0.53, 0.98)0.040a0.53 (0.35, 0.78)0.002a
Social Stress0.66 (0.42, 1.02)0.0641.23 (0.86, 1.76)0.267
Relax_Parent1.46 (0.81, 2.61)0.206
Upset_Parent0.91 (0.48, 1.75)0.782
Relax_Patient0.99 (0.55, 1.75)0.961
Upset_Patient1.22 (0.66, 2.27)0.528
Biofeedback reported at 1st follow up1.26 (0.76, 2.09)0.362