Basic Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2018.
World J Gastroenterol. Oct 14, 2018; 24(38): 4356-4368
Published online Oct 14, 2018. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v24.i38.4356
Table 4 Pairwise comparisons between groups are determined according to Dunn[35]
eNOSiNOSPDE5sGCa1sGCb1cGMP
CON vs FIBsig. (pairwise)0.0241-0.00210.0650.00610.151
sig. (adjusted)0.072-0.00610.1950.01810.453
CON vs CIRsig. (pairwise)0.0011-0.00110.00110.00110.0181
sig. (adjusted)0.0031-0.00310.00310.00310.054
FIB vs CIRsig. (pairwise)0.2800.7320.2010.1940.2670.495
sig. (adjusted)0.8401.0000.6030.5820.8011.000
CON vs CON + Silsig. (pairwise)n.m.2n.m.2n.m.2n.m.2n.m.20.0121
sig. (adjusted)n.m.2n.m.2n.m.2n.m.2n.m.20.0241
CIR vs CIR + Silsig. (pairwise)n.m.2n.m.2n.m.2n.m.2n.m.20.0091
sig. (adjusted)n.m.2n.m.2n.m.2n.m.2n.m.20.0181