Retrospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2018.
World J Gastroenterol. Sep 7, 2018; 24(33): 3786-3798
Published online Sep 7, 2018. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v24.i33.3786
Table 5 Comparison of the AUC, NRI and IDI of the contrast-enhanced ultrasound score nomogram vs contrast-enhanced ultrasound liver imaging reporting and data system nomogram in distinguishing intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma from hepatocellular carcinoma
AUC(95%CI)P valueNRI(95%CI)P valueIDI(95%CI)P value
Training set (n = 117)
CEUS LI-RADS nomogram0.891(0.834, 0.948)< 0.0010.446(0.263, 0.629)< 0.0010.210(0.140, 0.280)< 0.001
CEUS score nomogram0.971(0.948, 0.995)
Validation set (n = 59)
CEUS LI-RADS nomogram0.916(0.854, 0.978)0.0360.077(-0.141, 0.295)0.4880.152(0.044, 0.260)0.006
CEUS score nomogram0.973(0.941, 1.000)
≤ 5.0 cm subgroup (n = 59)
CEUS LI-RADS nomogram0.835(0.744, 0.926)0.0080.382(0.069, 0.695)0.0170.177(0.065, 0.289)0.002
CEUS score nomogram0.929(0.870, 0.988)
≤ 3.0 cm subgroup (n = 19)
CEUS LI-RADS nomogram0.881(0.732, 1.000)0.601-0.202(-0.572, 0.167)0.283-0.117(-0.284, 0.050)0.171
CEUS score nomogram0.905(0.772, 1.000)