Observational Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2018.
World J Gastroenterol. Jul 21, 2018; 24(27): 3030-3037
Published online Jul 21, 2018. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v24.i27.3030
Table 3 Detailed information of studies evaluating endoscopic resection for gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors
AuthorPublication yearStudy designCase nEndoscopic procedureTumor size, mean ± SD (cm)Pathologic risk grade, nComplete resection n (%)surgical intervention n (%)Recurrence n (%)Follow-up (mo)
Feng et al[14]2015RS50Endoscopic resection< 2MI ≤ 5, 41 MI > 5, 9NA1 (2.0)0321 (12-65)
Shen et al[13]2015RS32ER1.70 ± 0.36Very low, 9 low, 18 intermediate, 3 high, 232 (100)1 (3.1)1 (3.1)31.51 (2-53)
Joo et al[4]2016RS90ESD, 72 STER, 8 EMR, 7 EFTR, 2 Polypectomy, 12.3 ± 1.2Very low, 45 Low, 28 Intermediate, 1 High, 688 (97.8)5 (5.6)2 (2.2)46.0 ± 28.5
Tan et al[21]2017RS52STER, 20 EFTR, 32STER, 17.8 ± 7.2; EFTR, 15.4 ± 6.6Low, 26 Intermediate, 26En bloc 50 (96.2)1 (1.9)1 (1.9)10.9 ± 7.8 23.8 ± 18.6
An et al[11]2017RS168ESD1.51 (0.5-6)Very low, 117 Low, 37 Intermediate, 14En bloc 168 (100)00251 (6-67)
Balde et al[18]2017RS30ESD1.51 (1.0-1.8)Very low, 22 Low, 4 Intermediate, 427 (90.0)NA2 (6.7)57.9 (± 28.9)
Meng et al[19]2017RS75ESD1.44 ± 0.67NANANA2 (2.7)3.3 yr1 1-7 yr
Andalib et al[2]2018RS12EN, 5 EFTR, 72.41 (1.0 - 5.0)Low, 11 Intermediate, 111 (91.7)00121 (6.5-24)
This study-RS229EME, 179 EFTR, 32 STER, 181.901 (1.0-4.0)Very low, 147 Low, 72 Intermediate, 8 High, 2221 (96.5)10571 (46-71)