Retrospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2018.
World J Gastroenterol. Jan 14, 2018; 24(2): 266-273
Published online Jan 14, 2018. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v24.i2.266
Table 1 Univariate prognostic analysis of clinicopathological features n (%)
VariableAFPAGC(n = 105)Median OS (mo)P value
Sex
Male82 (78.1)15.00.144
Female23 (21.9)11.3
Age (yr)
≥ 6049 (46.7)15.00.189
< 6056 (53.3)12.0
Serum AFP level (ng/mL)
≥ 50037 (35.2)13.00.806
< 50068 (64.5)14.6
Primary lesion site
EGJ41 (39.8)15.00.245
Non-EGJ62 (60.2)12.0
Differentiation degree
Well30 (29.4)15.40.496
Poor66 (64.7)12.9
HAS6 (5.9)4.5
Lauren classification
Intestinal45 (57.0)15.40.352
Non-intestinal34 (43.0)14.6
HER2 status
Positive20 (24.4)17.50.583
Negative62 (75.6)14.6
LM
Present63 (60.0)12.00.048a
Absent42 (40.0)16.7
Peritoneal metastasis
Present16 (15.4)6.170.001a
Absent88 (84.6)15.2
Non-regional LNM
Present56 (53.3)11.00.042a
Absent49 (46.7)17.9
Other hematogenous metastasis
Present27 (25.7)10.50.004a
Absent78 (74.3)17.5
PVTT
Present13 (12.4)8.30.011a
Absent92 (87.6)15.0
First-line regimen
Doublet regimen89 (88.1)14.60.850
Triplet regimen12 (11.9)15.1
Evaluation
PR42 (48.3)17.60.007a
SD + PD45 (51.7)11.1
AFP decline degree
≥ 50%49 (55.7)17.50.003a
< 50%39 (44.3)10.0
Local treatment for LM
Yes19 (18.1)17.90.215
No86 (81.9)12.9