Retrospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2017.
World J Gastroenterol. Mar 7, 2017; 23(9): 1627-1636
Published online Mar 7, 2017. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v23.i9.1627
Table 2 Characteristics and complications according to the cancer type n (%)
Cholangiocarcinoman = 118Pancreatic cancern = 79non-pancreaticobiliary cancern = 47P value
Age (yr), mean ± SD73.5 ± 9.467.8 ± 10.469.3 ± 10.30.002
Hyperamylasemia, pre-procedure6 (5.1)3 (3.8)5 (10.6)0.273
Cholangitis, pre-procedure28 (23.7)19 (24.1)21 (44.7)0.021
Pancreatic duct invasion< 0.001
Yes12 (10.2)64 (81.0)9 (19.1)
No106 (89.8)15 (19.0)38 (80.9)
Lymph node metastasis0.345
Yes77 (65.3)58 (73.4)35 (74.5)
No41 (34.7)21 (26.6)12 (25.5)
Pancreatic duct injection0.606
092 (78.0)59 (74.7)36 (76.6)
1-28 (6.8)9 (11.4)7 (14.9)
318 (15.3)11 (13.9)4 (8.5)
Number of initially inserted SEMS0.004
1106 (89.8)79 (100.0)45 (95.7)
212 (10.2)0 (0.0)2 (4.3)
Post-ERCP complication0.696
Present5 (4.2)2 (2.5)2 (4.3)
Absent113 (95.8)77 (97.5)45 (95.7)
Post-ERCP complication type0.914
Pancreatitis4 (3.4)1 (1.3)2 (4.3)0.681
Mild/moderate3 (2.5)/1 (0.8)1 (1.3)/0 (0)2 (4.3)/0 (0)
Bleeding, mild1 (0.8)1 (1.3)0 (0)
Perforation0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)
Post-ERCP hyperamylasemia13 (11.0)9 (11.4)8 (17.0)
Stent complication0.539
None90 (76.3)70 (88.6)39 (83.0)
Stent occlusion27 (22.9)9 (11.4)8 (17.0)
Stent migration1 (0.8)0 (0)0 (0)
Patency0.161
No further procedure90 (76.3)70 (88.6)39 (83)
ERBD restent1 (0.8)0 (0)0 (0)
SEMS restent20 (16.9)9 (11.4)3 (6.4)
PTBD7 (5.9)0 (0)5 (10.6)