Retrospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2017.
World J Gastroenterol. Sep 14, 2017; 23(34): 6281-6286
Published online Sep 14, 2017. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v23.i34.6281
Table 2 Difference in assessment of polyp morphology per polyp n (%)
Pre-testPost-testFollow-up test
Number of polyps
One category per one question
Ip9 (15.0)8 (13.3)12 (20.0)
Isp6 (10.0)3 (5.0)0 (0.0)
Is0 (0.0)6 (10.0)3 (5.0)
IIa0 (0.0)11 (18.3)6 (10.0)
Total15 (25.0)28 (46.7)21 (35.0)
Two categories per one question
Ip-Isp6 (10.0)8 (13.3)5 (8.3)
Isp-Is7 (11.7)7 (11.7)8 (13.3)
Is-IIa24 (40.0)12 (20.0)20 (33.3)
IIa-IIc0 (0.0)1 (1.7)1 (1.7)
IIc-III1 (1.7)1 (1.7)1 (1.7)
Total38 (63.3)29 (48.3)35 (58.3)
Three categories per one question
Ip-Isp-Is1 (1.7)1 (1.7)4 (6.7)
Isp-Is-IIa5 (8.3)1 (1.7)0 (0.0)
Is-IIa-IIc1 (1.7)0 (0.0)0 (0.0)
IIa-IIb-IIc0 (0.0)1 (1.7)0 (0.0)
Total7 (11.7)3 (5.0)4 (6.7)