Retrospective Cohort Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2017.
World J Gastroenterol. Sep 7, 2017; 23(33): 6128-6136
Published online Sep 7, 2017. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v23.i33.6128
Table 3 Second-line treatment, stratified by first-line treatment n (%)
First-line treatment
Patients withsecond-line treatment
SSACCTTSSA + CCSSA + TTTT + CCIF
n12833145711189
67.7%17.5%7.4%2.6%3.7%0.5%0.5%100.0%
Second-line treatment
SSA + TT51 (39.8)4 (12.1)4 (28.6)3 (60.0)0 (0)1 (100.0)63 (33.3)
SSA + CC33 (25.8)6 (18.2)0 (0)5 (71.4)0 (0)0 (0)44 (23.3)
CC24 (18.8)4 (28.6)0 (0)1 (14.3)0 (0)0 (0)29 (15.3)
SSA16 (48.5)5 (35.7)0 (0)0 (0)1 (100.0)0 (0)22 (11.6)
TT12 (9.4)7 (21.2)2 (40.0)0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)21 (11.1)
SSA + IF3 (2.3)0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)3 (1.6)
IF2 (1.6)0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)2 (1.1)
TT + CC1 (0.8)0 (0)1 (7.1)0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)2 (1.1)
SSA + TT + CC1 (0.8)0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)1 (14.3)0 (0)0 (0)2 (1.1)
SSA + CC + IF1 (0.8)0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)1 (0.5)