Randomized Clinical Trial
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2017.
World J Gastroenterol. Jan 14, 2017; 23(2): 328-335
Published online Jan 14, 2017. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v23.i2.328
Table 4 Outcomes and adverse events in terms of the snares used for cold snare polypectomy
Profile snare (95%CI)Captivator-II snare (95%CI)P value
Endoscopic evaluation88/88 = 100%59/60 = 98.3%0.41
En-bloc resection rate with free cut-margin(95.9%-100.0%)(91.2%-100.0%)
Pathologic evaluation75/88 = 85.2%44/60 = 73.3%0.09
Complete resection rate with free cut-margin(76.1%-91.9%)(60.3%-83.9%)
Histological tissue injury0/88 = 0%2/60 = 3.3%0.16
(0.0%-4.1%)(0.4%-11.5%)
Adverse event
Immediate bleeding9/88 = 10.2%4/60 = 6.7%0.56
(4.8%-18.5%)(1.8%-16.2%)
Delayed bleeding00
Perforation00

  • Citation: Komeda Y, Kashida H, Sakurai T, Tribonias G, Okamoto K, Kono M, Yamada M, Adachi T, Mine H, Nagai T, Asakuma Y, Hagiwara S, Matsui S, Watanabe T, Kitano M, Chikugo T, Chiba Y, Kudo M. Removal of diminutive colorectal polyps: A prospective randomized clinical trial between cold snare polypectomy and hot forceps biopsy. World J Gastroenterol 2017; 23(2): 328-335
  • URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v23/i2/328.htm
  • DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v23.i2.328