Case Control Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2017.
World J Gastroenterol. May 14, 2017; 23(18): 3287-3294
Published online May 14, 2017. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v23.i18.3287
Table 2 Patient characteristics: Non-cirrhotic vs cirrhotics n (%)
No Cirrhosis(n = 228)Cirrhosis(n = 57)P value
Male180 (78.9)45 (78.9)0.99
Age at BE (yr)59.1 ± 9.658.9 ± 9.60.51
Body mass Index (kg/m2)30.3 ± 6.030.6 ± 7.10.10
Ethnicity0.97
Caucasian21454
African-American31
Other70
BE Length (cm)2.7 ± 3.13.5 ± 3.40.20
Presence of hiatal hernia128 (56.1)9 (16.1)< 0.0011
Hiatal hernia length (cm)3.2 ± 1.53.6 ± 1.010.31
Baseline biopsy0.10
No dysplasia155 (68.0)45 (78.9)
Low grade Dysplasia28 (12.3)5 (8.8)
High grade Dysplasia29 (12.7)5 (8.8)
Esophageal adenocarcinoma16 (7.0)2 (3.5)
Number of endoscopies3 (2, 6)2 (2, 4)0.0091
Follow-up endoscopy (mo)36.3 (13.6, 77.3)31.9 (12.5, 57.3)0.15