©The Author(s) 2016.
World J Gastroenterol. Dec 28, 2016; 22(48): 10673-10679
Published online Dec 28, 2016. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i48.10673
Published online Dec 28, 2016. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i48.10673
Table 4 Demographic characteristics of enrolled patients
| Pronase group | Placebo group | Value | P value | |
| Number of patients | 63 | 62 | ||
| Age, mean ± SD | 55.78 ± 12.37 | 53.47 ± 13.41 | t = 1.001 | 0.319 |
| Sex | ||||
| Male | 22 | 19 | χ2 = 0.259 | 0.611 |
| Female | 41 | 43 | ||
| Location | ||||
| Fundus | 14 | 9 | χ2 = 1.264 | 0.532 |
| Corpus | 26 | 29 | ||
| Antrum | 23 | 24 | ||
| Methods | ||||
| Radial EUS | 48 | 43 | χ2 = 0.737 | 0.391 |
| Linear-array EUS | 15 | 19 | ||
- Citation: Wang GX, Liu X, Wang S, Ge N, Guo JT, Sun SY. Effects of premedication with Pronase for endoscopic ultrasound of the stomach: A randomized controlled trial. World J Gastroenterol 2016; 22(48): 10673-10679
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v22/i48/10673.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v22.i48.10673