Retrospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2016.
World J Gastroenterol. Nov 21, 2016; 22(43): 9586-9594
Published online Nov 21, 2016. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i43.9586
Table 5 Validity of APRI, FIB-4, PPT, and APPCI models for prediction of cirrhosis, and comparison with the CG model (n = 193)
ModelAUC (95%CI)Youden’s indexSensitivitySpecificityPPVNPVZ valueP value
CG0.812 (0.740-0.883)0.56772.84%83.88%46.37%94.17%--
FIB-40.679 (0.581-0.777)0.31852.23%80.65%34.06%89.82%2.1380.0331
APRI0.775 (0.698-0.852)0.41664.20%77.43%34.52%91.46%0.6880.491
PPT0.777 (0.671-0.883)0.51280.25%70.97%34.59%94.94%0.5350.593
APPCI0.859 (0.789-0.929)0.59275.31%83.89%47.21%94.67%-0.9100.363
GP0.742 (0.647-0.838)0.42070.99%70.97%31.87%92.75%1.1400.254