Copyright
©The Author(s) 2016.
World J Gastroenterol. Jul 21, 2016; 22(27): 6268-6275
Published online Jul 21, 2016. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i27.6268
Published online Jul 21, 2016. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i27.6268
Table 2 Results of endoscopic submucosal dissection n (%)
| Hemo group | Non-Hemogroup | P value | |
| Operation time (min), median (range) | 121 (51-390) | 130 (28-540) | 0.98 |
| Procedure speed (mm2/min), median (range) | 0.18 (0.05-0.47) | 0.20 (0.02-0.57) | 0.46 |
| En bloc resection | 22 (96) | 48 (100) | 0.32 |
| Curative resection | 19 (83) | 43 (90) | 0.32 |
| Adverse events | |||
| Perforation | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 1.00 |
| Postoperative bleeding | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 1.00 |
- Citation: Tanaka S, Toyonaga T, Morita Y, Hoshi N, Ishida T, Ohara Y, Yoshizaki T, Kawara F, Umegaki E, Azuma T. Feasibility and safety of endoscopic submucosal dissection for lower rectal tumors with hemorrhoids. World J Gastroenterol 2016; 22(27): 6268-6275
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v22/i27/6268.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v22.i27.6268