©The Author(s) 2016.
World J Gastroenterol. Jul 14, 2016; 22(26): 5909-5916
Published online Jul 14, 2016. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i26.5909
Published online Jul 14, 2016. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i26.5909
Table 1 Pros and Cons of endoscopic papillary balloon dilatation
| Pros | Cons | |
| Endoscopic papillary balloon dilatation1 | Beginner-friendly | More pancreatitis? |
| Less bleeding | Lower success rate of stone removal? | |
| Less perforation? | ||
| Less biliary infection? | ||
| Adaptive to altered anatomy | ||
| Preserved sphincter function |
- Citation: Fujisawa T, Kagawa K, Hisatomi K, Kubota K, Nakajima A, Matsuhashi N. Is endoscopic papillary balloon dilatation really a risk factor for post-ERCP pancreatitis? World J Gastroenterol 2016; 22(26): 5909-5916
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v22/i26/5909.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v22.i26.5909