Basic Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2016.
World J Gastroenterol. Jun 21, 2016; 22(23): 5353-5363
Published online Jun 21, 2016. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i23.5353
Figure 4
Figure 4 Effects of gastric electrical stimulation on gastric emptying. Compared with the control group, gastric emptying in the DM group was significantly delayed (P < 0.01). However, gastric electrical stimulation (GES) significantly improved the delayed gastric emptying (P < 0.01 for all). Meanwhile, significance was found between the DM (diabetic group) + GES1 (GES parameter 1) group and DM + GES2 group (P = 0.0275). aP < 0.05 vs control; cP < 0.05 vs DM group; eP < 0.05, DM + GES1 vs DM + GES2 group.