©The Author(s) 2016.
World J Gastroenterol. May 14, 2016; 22(18): 4438-4445
Published online May 14, 2016. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i18.4438
Published online May 14, 2016. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i18.4438
Table 1 Comparison of hypothermic and normothermic mechanical perfusion
| Hypothermic mechanical perfusion | Normothermic mechanical perfusion | |
| Temperature | 4 °C | 37 °C |
| Pathophysiology | Reduced cellular metabolism | Continued cellular metabolism |
| Non-functioning liver during preservation | Functioning liver during preservation | |
| Perfusate | No specific requirements, oxygen can be used | Continuous delivery of nutrients and oxygen needs to be maintained |
| Logistics | Similar to that of hypothermic mechanical perfusion currently used for renal allografts | More complex |
| Benefits | Logistically easier | Allows for the assessment of metabolic and synthetic function during preservation |
| May provide benefit in marginal livers | May provide benefit in marginal livers | |
| Potential use in steatotic livers | ||
| Felt to reduce ischemia reperfusion injury |
- Citation: Jadlowiec CC, Taner T. Liver transplantation: Current status and challenges. World J Gastroenterol 2016; 22(18): 4438-4445
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v22/i18/4438.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v22.i18.4438