Editorial
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2016.
World J Gastroenterol. Apr 7, 2016; 22(13): 3511-3515
Published online Apr 7, 2016. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i13.3511
Table 1 Thermal ablation in colorectal liver metastases: When the evidence can not be very evident
Phase III RCTCompared armsStatus of RCTResults
French FFCD 2002-02Surgical resection vs RFAClosed because of non accrualNot published
United States Nat Surg Adj Br Bow trialCT + HAI vs CT + Resection or RFAClosed because of non accrualNot published
CLOCC (median FU 4.4 yr)[22]CT vs CT + RFADownscaled to Phase II trial because of slow accrualOS: P = 0.22
PFS: P = 0.025 in favour of CT + RFA
CLOCC (median FU 9.7 yr)[26]CT vs CT + RFAFU in progressOS: P = 0.01 in favour of CT + RFA