Meta-Analysis
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2015.
World J Gastroenterol. Feb 7, 2015; 21(5): 1650-1662
Published online Feb 7, 2015. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i5.1650
Table 2 Subgroup and meta-regression analyses of waist circumference and the risk of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease
CovariatesSubgroupStudies, nOR(95%CI)P of QI2Inter-groupP valueUnivariateP valueMultivariateP value
Per-unit increase in waist circumference
RegionEast91.076 (1.025-1.129)0.00073.60.0060.1710.214
West21.031 (1.016-1.046)0.5350.0
Designc-s81.063 (1.014-1.114)0.00079.10.1570.7640.984
Others31.071 (1.026-1.119)0.25426.9
AdjustedYes71.051 (1.019-1.084)0.03555.80.0310.4890.770
(> 3 confounders)No41.126 (1.000-1.269)0.00085.0
IndividualsYes61.054 (1.025-1.083)0.05556.70.1630.7280.975
(> 700)No51.100 (0.991-1.22)0.00081.5
High vs low category of waist circumference
Designc-s52.113 (1.615-2.765)0.18036.20.0570.6420.947
Others24.072 (2.189-7.575)0.5120.0
IndividualsYes32.070 (1.546-2.774)0.24528.90.1220.6350.942
(> 600)No43.185 (2.010-5.046)0.16441.2