Systematic Reviews
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2015.
World J Gastroenterol. Dec 14, 2015; 21(46): 13177-13187
Published online Dec 14, 2015. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i46.13177
Table 2 Quality measures of the analyzed studies: Newcastle-Ottawa Scale - Bias measures
Ref.Representativeness of exposed cohort and selection of the non exposed cohort (max. 2 points)Ascertainment of exposure (max. 1 point)Demonstration that outcome of interest was not present at start of study (max. 1 point)Comparability of cohorts on the basis of the design or analysis (max. 2 points)Assessment of outcome (max. 1 point)Length and adequacy of follow up (max. 2 points)Score and levels of evidence
Nishida et al[16]2111117 - 2b - acceptable (+)
Fukase et al[14]2111117 - 2b - acceptable (+)
Kim et al[17]2112129 - 2b - acceptable (+)
Etoh et al[15]2112129 - 2b - acceptable (+)
Choi et al[18]2112129 - 2b - acceptable (+)
Chiu et al[19]2111128 - 2b - acceptable (+)
Fukunaga et al[20]2111128 - 2b - acceptable (+)
Park et al[21]2112129 - 2b - acceptable (+)
Kim et al[22]2112129 - 2b - acceptable (+)
Choi et al[23]2112129 - 2b - acceptable (+)
Kim et al[24]2112129 - 2b - acceptable (+)