Copyright
©The Author(s) 2015.
World J Gastroenterol. Nov 28, 2015; 21(44): 12635-12643
Published online Nov 28, 2015. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i44.12635
Published online Nov 28, 2015. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i44.12635
Table 3 Clinical management of delayed perforation induced by gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection
| Case | Age (yr) | Sex | Stomach status | Time until the occurrence of delayed perforation (h) | Panperitonitis or severe mediastinitis | Management of delayed perforation | Hospital stay (d) |
| 1 | 68 | Male | Gastric tube | 11 | Absent | Conservative management | 45 |
| 2 | 75 | Male | Normal stomach | 35 | Absent | Conservative management | 18 |
| 3 | 80 | Male | Normal stomach | 6 | Absent | Conservative management with endoloop-endoclip technique | 18 |
| 4 | 64 | Female | Gastric tube | 7 | Absent | Conservative management with endoloop-endoclip technique | 25 |
| 5 | 73 | Male | Normal stomach | 9 | Present (Panperitonitis) | Emergency surgery | 15 |
| 6 | 62 | Female | Normal stomach | 27 | Present (Panperitonitis) | Emergency surgery | 18 |
| 7 | 56 | Female | Normal stomach | 172 | Present (Panperitonitis) | Emergency surgery | 15 |
- Citation: Suzuki H, Oda I, Sekiguchi M, Abe S, Nonaka S, Yoshinaga S, Nakajima T, Saito Y. Management and associated factors of delayed perforation after gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection. World J Gastroenterol 2015; 21(44): 12635-12643
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v21/i44/12635.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v21.i44.12635