Retrospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2015.
World J Gastroenterol. Nov 21, 2015; 21(43): 12392-12402
Published online Nov 21, 2015. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i43.12392
Table 1 Patient characteristics n (%)
Characteristicsmean ± SD
Number of patients185
Gender
Female100 (54.1)
Male85 (45.9)
Age at diagnosis51.4 ± 17.6
Age at ultrasonographic examination58.7 ± 18.2
Sonomorphological classification
Hailstorm100 (54.1)
Pseudocystic25 (13.5)
Ossification24 (13.0)
Hemangioma-like15 (8.1)
Metastasis-like12 (6.5)
Unclassifiable9 (4.9)
Number of lesions
1116
224
316
45
57
6-104
> 1013
Mean diameter of the largest lesion62.5 ± 40.4
Mean lesion diameter according to sonomorphological classification
Hailstorm59.6 ± 27.9
Pseudocystic120.0 ± 47.3
Ossification28.0 ± 19.4
Hemangioma-like68.1 ± 37.3
Metastasis-like35.3 ± 33.1
Unclassifiable53.9 ± 30.6
Localization of the largest lesion (hepatic lobe)
Right113 (61.1)
Left58 (31.4)
Both14 (7.6)
Calcification
No47 (25.4)
Yes138 (74.6)
Affected liver segments (multiple segments possible)
I6 (3.2)
II19 (10.3)
III22 (11.9)
IVa30 (16.2)
IVb28 (15.1)
V44 (23.8)
VI41 (22.2)
VII44 (23.8)
VIII41 (22.2)
Steatosis hepatis
No147 (79.5)
Yes38 (20.5)
Liver size in mid-clavicular line (mm)146.1 ± 25.2