BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Observational Study
©The Author(s) 2015.
World J Gastroenterol. Jan 28, 2015; 21(4): 1275-1283
Published online Jan 28, 2015. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i4.1275
Table 1 Patient characteristics according to BRAF or KRAS status n (%)
CharacteristicsKRAS status
BRAF status
Wild-type n = 500Mutant n = 312P valueWild-type n = 771Mutant n = 40P value
Age (yr)0.110.40
mean ± SD63.5 ± 10.364.7 ± 10.363.9 ± 10.365.4 ± 11.6
Gender0.020.006
Male308 (62)166 (53)459 (60)15 (38)
Female192 (38)146 (47)312 (40)25 (63)
Tumor location0.37< 0.001
Proximal134 (27)98 (31)201 (26)31 (78)
Distal213 (43)125 (40)332 (43)5 (13)
Rectum153 (31)89 (29)238 (31)4 (10)
Histological grade0.24< 0.001
Well/moderate472 (94)288 (92)728 (94)31 (78)
Poor/mucinous28 (6)24 (8)43 (6)9 (23)
T stage0.120.89
152 (10)31 (10)79 (10)4 (10)
2106 (21)46 (15)145 (19)7 (18)
3286 (57)200 (64)462 (60)23 (58)
456 (11)35 (11)85 (11)6 (15)
LN metastasis0.180.96
Yes180 (36)127 (41)292 (38)15 (38)
No320 (64)185 (59)479 (62)25 (63)
TNM stage0.090.92
I125 (25)58 (19)173 (22)10 (25)
II195 (39)127 (41)306 (40)15 (38)
III180 (36)127 (41)292 (38)15 (38)
Adjuvant chemotherapy0.440.57
Yes217 (43)144 (46)344 (45)16 (40)
No283 (57)168 (54)427 (55)24 (60)
MSI status0.33< 0.001
MSS/MSI-L455 (91)290 (93)728 (94)16 (40)
MSI-H45 (9)22 (7)43 (6)24 (60)


Write to the Help Desk