Review
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2015.
World J Gastroenterol. Sep 28, 2015; 21(36): 10348-10357
Published online Sep 28, 2015. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i36.10348
Table 3 Positive impact of a sleeve gastrectomy on gastroesophageal reflux disease
Ref.Nature of the studyPatients, nPre-operative BMI (kg/m2)GERD evaluationFollow-up (mo)GERD (%) PreopGERD (%) Postop
Melissas et al[39], 2008Prospective study1449.5CA242 (14%)1 (7%)
Nocca et al[40], 2008Multicenter prospective study16345.9NA2410 (6.1%)6 (3.6%)
Petersen et al[41], 2012Prospective study: 3 groups3750.5 and 47.5CA; EMNANALESP: 8.4 to 21.2 mmHg may protect against GERD
Chopra et al[42], 2012Retrospective review and analysis18549.0CA; EGD6NAImprovement: 46%
De novo: 3.2%
Daes et al[35], 2012Concurrent cohort study13439.0CA; EGD1249.2%1.50%
Rawlins et al[43], 2013Retrospective study5565.0CA; NA6027%27%
53% resolution
16% de novo
Santonicola et al[37], 2013Retrospective comparative180LSG: 36.5CA13-18LSG: 39.2 %LSG: 22.5%, de novo: 17.7%
LSG vs LSG + HHR78 LSGLSG + HHR: 39.3EGDLSG + HHR: 38.4%LSG+HHR: 43.3%, de novo: 22.9%
102 LSG + HHRIf GERD: dc - BM
Sharma et al[19], 2014Prospective study3247.8CDS12CDS: 2.88CDS: 1.63 (P < 0.05)
GERD SSSS: 2.28SS: 1.06 (P < 0.05)
EGDRS: 6.25%RS: 78.1%(P < 0.001)
RSEsophagitis: 18.8%Esophagitis: 25%, reduction of severity
Rebecchi et al[20], 2014Prospective study7144.3GSAS24A:A:
A: PAEEGDGSAS: 53.1GSAS: 13.1
B: NAEBMDemeester: 39.5Demeester: 10.6
EMB:B:
24-h pHDemeester: 11.9Demeester: 12
de novo: 5.4%
Pallati et al[38], 2014Prospective database58548.5GERD-symptom grading based on medication use6All patients includedScore improvement 41%
Worsening: 4.6 %
de novo: 9.2%
Del genio et al[44], 2014Prospective database2546.1CA; HRiM, MII-pH13Patient excluded if preop. GERDNo de novo GERD
Retrospective analysis
Daes et al[36], 2014Prospective evaluation38237.7CA2244.5%2.6%
EGD94% resolution of symptoms
Total: 12 studies