BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Home / Archive / Volume 21, Issue 30
  • This Article
Peer-Review Report of This Article
CrossCheck and Google Search of This Article
Academic Rules and Norms of This Article
Citation of this article
Corresponding Author of This Article
Research Domain of This Article
Article-Type of This Article
Open-Access Policy of This Article
Times Cited Counts in Google of This Article
Journal Information of This Article
Publication Name
World Journal of Gastroenterology
ISSN
1007-9327
Publisher of This Article
Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA

Retrospective Study
©The Author(s) 2015.
World J Gastroenterol. Aug 14, 2015; 21(30): 9126-9133
Published online Aug 14, 2015. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i30.9126
Table 1 Relationship between mucosal type and endoscopic findings n (%)
AssessmentMucosa type
OM/OCM (n = 20)CM (n = 41)P value
Los Angeles classification
N15 (75.0)18 (43.9)0.022
M, A, B, C, D5 (25.0)23 (56.1)
Hill grade
Normal (1, 2)16 (80.0)27 (65.9)0.255
Reflux (3, 4)4 (20.0)14 (34.1)
Hiatal hernia
Absent15 (75.0)22 (53.7)0.109
Present5 (25.0)19 (46.3)
CM: Cardiac mucosa; OCM: Oxyntocardiac mucosa; OM: Oxyntic mucosa.
Full Size Table
Write to the Help Desk
Copyright © 1993-2026 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA. All rights reserved, including rights relating to text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies. For open-access content, the applicable copyright and licensing terms govern.